Policy
State AI Safety Bills Gain Momentum as Federal Action Stalls
Pennsylvania lawmakers join growing coalition preparing artificial intelligence regulation for 2027 legislative sessions.
Key takeaways
- Pennsylvania Democrats Melissa Shusterman and Greg Scott are preparing AI safety legislation for introduction ahead of the 2027 session.
- At least 12 states including California, Illinois, and Maryland are developing AI safety bills in response to concerns about advanced AI systems.
- State legislative action accelerates as federal lawmakers remain gridlocked on comprehensive AI regulation.
- Lawmakers cite recent news headlines about AI risks as motivation for targeting frontier artificial intelligence models.
- The 2027 state legislative sessions will see coordinated introduction of AI safety measures across multiple jurisdictions.
State legislators mobilize on AI regulation
State lawmakers across the United States are preparing a new wave of artificial intelligence safety legislation for 2027 sessions, driven by mounting concerns about risks from advanced AI systems and the absence of federal regulatory action.
Pennsylvania Representatives Melissa Shusterman and Greg Scott, both Democrats, have announced plans to introduce AI safety legislation in the coming months. Their effort reflects a broader pattern of state-level activity on AI governance, with lawmakers in California, Illinois, Maryland, and at least nine other states developing similar proposals.
According to State Affairs, multiple legislators cited recent news coverage of AI-related incidents as motivation for their legislative work. Some are crafting entirely new bills, while others plan to reintroduce measures that failed to advance in previous sessions.
Why it matters
The state-level push represents a significant shift in AI governance strategy. With Congress unable to reach consensus on comprehensive AI regulation, states are stepping into the vacuum to address what lawmakers describe as "frontier artificial intelligence models" that could cause serious harm. This fragmented approach could create a patchwork of varying requirements across states, forcing AI companies to navigate multiple regulatory frameworks—a scenario that typically prompts federal lawmakers to act. The 2027 legislative calendar will test whether states can coordinate their approaches or whether competing standards will emerge.
Federal inaction drives state initiatives
The state legislative activity comes as Washington remains deadlocked on artificial intelligence policy. Despite bipartisan acknowledgment of AI's transformative potential and associated risks, federal lawmakers have not passed comprehensive AI safety legislation.
This gridlock has created space for states to experiment with their own regulatory approaches. The pattern mirrors previous technology policy debates where states moved first on issues ranging from data privacy to autonomous vehicles.
The specific provisions of the Pennsylvania legislation have not been disclosed, and details about bills in other states remain limited. However, the lawmakers' focus on "frontier" AI models suggests the legislation may target the most advanced and capable systems rather than applying broadly to all AI applications.
State Affairs first reported these developments, noting the coordinated timing as legislators prepare for sessions beginning in early 2027.
