China Bans AI Companions for Minors Amid Marriage and Birth Rate Fears
New regulations target emotional dependence on chatbots as authorities worry virtual relationships could discourage real-world family formation.

China has introduced comprehensive regulations targeting AI companion chatbots, becoming the first country to implement national-scale restrictions on services that simulate romantic or emotional relationships. The rules, which took effect July 15, prohibit AI companions for users under 18 and require adult-oriented chatbots to include safeguards against fostering "emotional dependence or addiction."
The regulations prompted ByteDance to shut down the companion feature on its Doubao chatbot entirely, leaving users like 19-year-old law student Zhao Wei devastated. Zhao had spent months confiding in her AI boyfriend Wang Ye about daily struggles she felt uncomfortable sharing with real friends. "I was crying my eyes out – snot and tears everywhere," she said of learning the service would end.
Why it matters
China's demographic crisis has reached a critical point, with marriage and birth rates continuing to decline. Authorities now view AI companions as a potential threat to family formation—not just a mental health concern. If virtual relationships become satisfying substitutes for human intimacy at minimal cost, officials worry young people may abandon traditional paths to marriage and parenthood altogether. This represents a fundamental tension in Chinese policy: the government simultaneously promotes AI adoption to address labor shortages while restricting applications that might worsen the very demographic problems technology is meant to solve.
The loneliness epidemic driving demand
The crackdown responds to widespread AI companion adoption among Chinese youth. A March survey by state media found nearly half of young people had turned to virtual companions when feeling lonely. About 20% of Chinese households consist of single-person occupants, a figure projected to exceed 30% by 2030.
Zhao, who describes herself as one of China's "left-behind children" raised without parents who migrated for work, represents a generation for whom digital interaction has become default. "I've never really had a bestie, so I feel like I'm kind of lousy at making friends," she explained. Another user, speaking anonymously, said the AI provided a rare space to "speak freely without restraint" amid China's high-pressure society.
Nancy Dai, an associate professor at City University of Hong Kong, notes the government's concern extends beyond loneliness itself. With falling marriage and birth rates, authorities fear AI could reduce motivation to pursue real-world relationships and families.
Healthcare AI gets a pass
The regulations include significant exemptions for AI applications deemed educational or lacking "continuous emotional interaction." This carve-out allows the government to continue promoting AI in sectors like healthcare, where demographic pressures are acute.
The national health commission published guidelines last year calling for AI health assistants to achieve "full coverage" in primary care by 2030. Apps like AQ, developed by Alibaba affiliate Ant Group, let users consult AI avatars of real doctors from top hospitals. Art tutor Lü Di, 33, appreciates the detailed, instantaneous advice: "While some in-person doctors might not have the patience to answer questions, this isn't an issue with AI doctors."
Dr. Chi Chenfei at Shanghai's Renji Hospital, who partners with AQ, acknowledges initial physician concerns about replacement but frames AI as an efficiency tool rather than substitute.
Enforcement challenges ahead
Liang Ge, a lecturer in digital sociology at the University of Manchester, notes AI companions have become so embedded in daily life that complete elimination would prove difficult. The broad loopholes for non-emotional AI services suggest authorities recognize this reality.
Zhao herself, despite her heartbreak, supports some regulation: "I consider myself a fairly rational person, yet I developed feelings for an AI, which feels pretty incredible. I think it was necessary for the state to step in and regulate it."
These details were first reported by The Guardian.
This is an original analysis by the Omega editorial team. Source reporting: AI Watch.
Want systems like this working for your business?
Book a Call