Retailers Push to Exempt AI-Generated Ads From EU Disclosure Rules
Eurocommerce argues that product marketing images created with AI should not be labeled as deepfakes under the incoming AI Act.

Retailers Challenge EU AI Transparency Requirements
A coalition of Europe's largest retailers is asking the European Union to carve out an exemption for AI-generated advertising from new transparency rules set to take effect in August. Eurocommerce, whose members include Amazon, H&M, Inditex, and Ikea, argues that routine product marketing created with artificial intelligence should not fall under regulations designed to combat deceptive deepfakes.
The European Union AI Act, which becomes enforceable on August 2, mandates clear labeling whenever artificial intelligence generates or modifies images, video, or audio content that constitutes a deepfake. The regulation aims to help consumers identify synthetic media that could mislead them.
In a letter sent Thursday to EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen, Eurocommerce director general Christel Delberghe contended that AI-generated advertisements without deceptive intent should be excluded from the deepfake definition. The letter specifically cited examples such as generating images of furnished rooms to display sofas or enhancing product visuals for presentation purposes.
Why It Matters
This dispute highlights a fundamental tension in AI regulation: distinguishing between harmful synthetic media and legitimate commercial applications. Retailers have rapidly adopted AI imaging tools to reduce costs—German online retailer Zalando reports 90% savings in content production, while H&M and Zara now use AI-generated model clones. If forced to label all AI-assisted content, retailers argue the disclosure becomes meaningless noise rather than useful consumer protection. The outcome will set precedent for how transparency requirements apply to widespread business uses of generative AI across the EU market.
Industry Stakes in AI Labeling
The retail sector's concern centers on practical implementation. Delberghe warned that applying the regulation to AI-edited or AI-generated advertisements would require labeling "a very large share of AI-assisted content," potentially diluting the value of disclosures to consumers. When labels become ubiquitous, the argument goes, they lose their power to alert users to genuinely manipulated content.
Retailers have already integrated AI image generation deeply into their operations. The technology enables rapid creation of product photography, lifestyle imagery, and marketing materials at a fraction of traditional costs. Fast-fashion brands have moved particularly quickly to adopt AI-generated models, eliminating the need for photoshoots while maintaining visual consistency across campaigns.
The industry group's position distinguishes between content designed to deceive—such as fabricated endorsements or manipulated evidence—and commercial imagery that consumers already understand to be stylized marketing. Whether EU regulators accept this distinction will determine compliance burdens for an industry that has made AI imaging central to its digital operations.
Details of the lobbying effort were first reported by Reuters.
This is an original analysis by the Omega editorial team. Source reporting: AI Watch.
Want systems like this working for your business?
Book a Call